李國章足本錄音曝光： 啲人覺得我係bad guy 特首梁振英被指鐵定委任行會成員李國章任港大校委會主席，激起外界反響。就在此際，再有校委會會議內容曝光。李在會上討論禁制令風波時「挑戰」偷錄者，要求站出來對質。
【11月12日會議，討論禁制令事宜李國章發言摘錄】 You
are very clear in what you have just told us. But I think there's only
one side of it. Obviously there are some members of this council,
member or members of this council, who is holding a very different view
in terms of public accountability, public's right to know, freedom of
the press and so on.
I would like, at this point, to challenge
that whether who will do come out and try to convince us their
positions. Because this is what council meeting is about--- discussion,
alright? So if they have the courage to believe that what they have
done is correct, I would like to challenge that person or persons to
come out and say what I did that because I believe that and the reason
I need you to believe.
So that it may convince some of us, to
say,‘Look, the injunction was wrong and maybe we shouldn’t have an
injunction.'Other than just hearing one side, I'd like to say whoever
it is who did the recording or know about the recording come out and
defend, or at least have the courage to put their case to this council.
Yes Chairman this is exactly
the point I try to refer it, it was that we just keep hearing from
legal advisor telling us this is it or that. I haven’t heard an
opposing view to that, alright?
And I think in a discussion,
which is what the council should be, I would like to hear an opposing
view. And obviously, some people who are very passionate about this to
go to the trouble of secretly illicitly recording council proceeding---
probably right now! I would like to see… if they got the courage to
come out and say‘Yes I believe this is freedom of whatever!’ So I put
the challenge to them.
Thank you Chairman. I
think one of the…firstly I ought to state a conflict of interest that…
I’d like to declare it first. I see it as two important issues. One I
agree with the first thing that it is the reputation of the university
that we believe in confidentiality to protect other people not so much
ourselves.
But the second important issue I think is that we
must have a better public relation, because, at the moment, it makes as
if we're trying to keep confidential in order to hide something, that
we have something that we should look out.So it is transparency.
Oh!
These people are all bad guys that are hiding. And quite honestly, I
have nothing to hide. I'm very happy to have everything I said
including this meeting to be released to the public. But at the same
time the whole emphasis is that we are hiding something, we are doing
something underhand. And I think if we take the root that we are gonna
uphold confidentiality we have to be very clear in our public relation
that we're not doing it in order to hide something.
【11月24日會議，討論如何懲處開記招披露會議內容的港大學生會會長馮敬恩，李國章發言摘錄】 I
think the important thing is that, for the Vice-Chancellor has already
said, is that he has breached confidentiality, full stop.
正如校長所言，我認為重點是他（馮敬恩）有否違反保密原則？僅此而已。
Now
it is mitigation, whether you accept it or not, he believes in
transparency and openness. And then, for he would make decision on
every item, whether he would disclose confidentiality. In other words,
for every item in the future, we will have to rely on his judgment to
say, you know, this is openness and I am gonna disclose so and so or so
and so said and so on.
I
think this is a fundamental breach of collective responsibility which,
according to our code, is paramount. We may disappoint you to certain
decision, but if we disagree with certain decisions because of openness
and transparency, we argue it out in this meeting; we don’t go outside
of this meeting.
If
you could not keep this, I cannot see how we could go back to any
restricted or confidential items until he is prepared to say that he is
going to lead part of the collective responsibility, unless he is going
to sign the code of confidentiality. I cannot see how we can have a
member here and we wasted an hour just arguing over this and each time,
each meeting we would get arguing over this again and again.
So,
lets be very clear to say that, yes, you have breached confidentiality.
And now the question is: do we accept the fact that his reason is
openness, transparency and public interest? We accept that, fine. We
can take a vote on that and accept that. Then in that case there will
be no more confidentiality in this council, alright? And this is a
fundamental change of policy of this university.
If
on the other hand we don’t accept his mitigation, then we will say,
stop what we want and you are now excluded from all confidentiality. It
is really as simple as that my chairman
洋名Angus的申請人梁俊光（譯音）於2002年加入入境處，任職入境事務主任，翌年晉升為高級入境事
務主任。他在長達百多頁的入稟狀透露，自中學已發現自己的性傾向，2005年與外籍的Scott Paul
Adams認識。兩人於2012年拍拖，相愛兩年後決定於去年4月18日在新西蘭舉行私人婚禮，並於4月30日正式取得結婚證書。
